You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 5 Perceptions of research feasibility and the importance of mentoring

From: Factors associated with underrepresented minority physician scientist trainee career choices

  Total, n (%) Asian or Pacific Islander, n (%) Black or African American,
n (%)
Multiracial or Other, n (%) White,
n (%)
P-value Hispanic, n (%) Hispanic P-value
How feasible is a research intense career in acute care medicine specialties?      0.0315   0.4490
 Highly feasible 244 (6.33%) 18 (4.41%) 12 (7.64%) 41 (7.43%) 173 (6.32%)   15 (6.44%)  
 Feasible 1234 (32.0%) 149 (36.5%) 49 (31.2%) 177 (32.1%) 859 (31.4%)   78 (33.48%)  
 Difficult 1605 (41.6%) 176 (43.1%) 74 (47.1%) 209 (37.9%) 1146 (41.8%)   103 (44.21%)  
 Highly difficult 711 (18.4%) 59 (14.5%) 22 (14.0%) 119 (21.6%) 511 (18.7%)   32 (13.73%  
 Impossible 62 (1.61%) 6 (1.47%) 0 (−-) 6 (1.09%) 50 (1.83%)   5 (2.15%)  
TOTAL 3856 (100%) 408 (100%) 157 (100%) 552 (100%) 2739 (100%)   233 (100%)  
 How feasible is a research intense career in surgical specialties?      0.0538   0.7247
 Highly feasible 253 (6.56%) 30 (7.35%) 7 (4.46%) 48 (8.71%) 168 (6.13%)   17 (7.33%)  
 Feasible 1169 (30.3%) 114 (27.9%) 55 (35.0%) 157 (28.5%) 843 (30.8%)   64 (27.59%)  
 Difficult 1350 (35.0%) 140 (34.3%) 61 (38.9%) 168 (30.5%) 981 (35.8%)   79 (34.05%)  
 Highly difficult 947 (24.6%) 107 (26.3%) 29 (18.5%) 157 (28.5%) 654 (23.9%)   61 (26.29%_  
 Impossible 137 (3.55%) 17 (4.17%) 5 (3.18%) 21 (3.81%) 94 (3.43%)   11 (4.74%)  
TOTAL 3856 (100%) 408 (100%) 157 (100%) 551 (100%) 2704 (100%)   232 (100%_  
Can you currently identify a mentor(s) who has helped you progress toward &/or achieve your career goals?      0.1445   0.6488
 Yes 2890 (76.3%) 322 (78.9%) 125 (82.2%) 409 (76.5%) 2034 (75.5%)   181 (77.7%)  
 No 898 (23.7%) 86 (21.1%) 27 (17.8%) 126 (23.6%) 659 (24.5%)   52 (22.3%)  
TOTAL 3788 (100%) 408 (100%) 152 (100%) 535 (100%) 2693 (100%)   233 (100%)  
How important has mentorship been in your training thus far?      <.0001   0.3868
 Very important 1274 (44.5%) 145 (45.6%) 72 (57.6%) 214 (52.5%) 843 (41.8%)   89 (50.3%)  
 Somewhat important 1267 (44.2%) 129 (40.6%) 50 (40.0%) 159 (39.0%) 929 (46.1%)   68 (38.4%)  
 Not very important 300 (10.5%) 42 (13.2%) 3 (2.40%) 32 (7.48%) 223 (11.1%)   18 (10.17%)  
 Not at all important 25 (0.87%) 2 (0.63%) 0 (−-) 3 (0.74%) 20 (0.99%)   2 (1.13%)  
TOTAL 2866 (100%) 318 (100%) 125 (100%) 408 (100%) 2015 (100%)   177 (100%_  
How much importance is given to talents/accomplishments when recruiting applicants for jobs and/or positions in science and medicine?      0.0405   <.0001
 A great deal of importance 1170 (30.9%) 152 (37.4%) 49 (32.0%) 174 (32.5%) 795 (29.5%)   70 (30.2%)  
 A lot of importance 1835 (48.5%) 181 (44.5%) 66 (43.1%) 256 (47.9%) 1332 (49.5%)   110 (47.4%)  
 Moderate amount of importance 719 (19.0%) 70 (17.2%) 36 (23.5%) 95 (17.8%) 518 (19.3%)   46 (19.8%)  
 Little importance 60 (1.58%) 3 (0.74%) 2 (1.31%) 9 (1.68%) 46 (1.71%)   3 (1.29%)  
 None at all 2 (0.05%) 1 (0.25%) 0 (−-) 1 (0.19%) 0 (−-)   3 (1.29%)  
TOTAL 3786 (100%) 407 (100%) 153 (100%) 535 (100%) 2691 (100%)   232 (100%)  
 How much importance is given to connections/networking when recruiting applicants for jobs and/or positions in science and medicine?        0.0053
 A great deal of importance 1223 (32.3%) 152 (37.3%) 67 (44.1%) 213 (39.8%) 791 (29.4%)   101 (43.2%)  
 A lot of importance 1603 (42.3%) 157 (38.5%) 54 (35.5%) 205 (38.3%) 1187 (44.0%)   87 (37.2%)  
 Moderate amount of importance 844 (22.3%) 86 (21.1%) 27 (17.8%) 96 (17.9%) 635 (23.6%)   43 (18.4%)  
 Little importance 118 (3.11%) 12 (2.94%) 4 (2.63%) 21 (3.93%) 81 (3.01%)   3 (1.28%)  
TOTAL 3790 (100%) 408 (100%) 152 (100%) 535 (100%) 2695 (100%)   234 (100%)